Performance Verification report for cotton inserter 1
This article contains information about Performance Verification report for cotton inserter
Performance Verification report for cotton inserter
Objective:
To ensure that the Cotton Inserter is capable of inserting the cotton pieces as per set length.
Scope:
Applicable to Cotton insertion by using cotton inserter machine in container packing line.
Site of study:
Packing Department
Location: _______________.
Validation Team:
Representatives from:
Packing : ________________
Quality Assurance : ________________
Engineering : ________________
Description of the Equipment to be Validated / used:
Equipment : Cotton Inserter
Code No. : __________
Make : __________
Cotton inserter machine Qualification done on: ____________
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to be followed:
SOP for Operating of Cotton inserter machine POP: ________________
Requirements:
- Cotton in roll form. : _____________
- Speed of machine. : _____________
- Standard weight of cotton to be inserted. : _____________
- Size of container : _____________
Calibration:
Sr. No.
|
Equipment
|
Calibration done on
|
Calibration due on
|
Training:
Sr. No.
|
Name | Training Status | Availability of reports | Checked By |
|
Precautions :
Proper safety aspects must be followed.
Validation details of Verification of cotton inserter
Carry out Validation as per the Validation Protocol.
Comparison of length with weight of cotton :
SR.NO. | LENGTH | APPROXIMATE WEIGHT | ACTUAL OBSERVED WEIGHT ( ± 10 %) |
1. | 100 MM | 1 GM | |
2. | 200 MM | 2 GM | |
3. | 300 MM | 2.5 GM | |
4. | 400 MM | 3 GM | |
5. | 500 MM | 5 GM |
Based on above annexure length of cotton to be set as required on amount of cotton to be filled in the container as per specification / batch Packing Record.
1. | Equipment: | ||
2. | Product: | ||
3. | Batch No: | ||
4. | Item code for cotton: | ||
5. | A.R. No. of cotton: | ||
6. | Container fill Value: | ||
7. | Date of experiment: |
Acceptance criteria:
- The container should contain exact quantity set in program.
- The product should not get damaged.
- Weight of cotton should be within the limit
Type of Validation:
Concurrent Validation:
Frequency:
One validation exercises every two year.
Non-Compliance:
Details of Deviation (if any):
Deviation Report Number | Deviation Report Dated | Checked by |
Details of Out of Specification (if any):
OOS Report Number | OOS Report Dated | Checked by |
Observation and Results:
Weighing Balance code No: _______________ Calibration done on:_______
Standard fill value of cotton per container: ___________ Calibration due on:________
Number of cotton pieces: _______________
Date. | Time | Quantity of cotton observed ± 10 % |
Rejection observed if any | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
Date. | Time | Quantity of cotton observed ± 10 % |
Rejection observed if any | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
Summary of finding of experiment (inference):
Recommendation:
Team Approval:
_____________ _______________ _____________
Packing Quality Assurance Engineering
Date: Date: Date:
Review: (Inclusive of follow up action, if any)
Approved by:
__________________ ____________
Quality Assurance Plant Head
Date: Date:
Annexures:
Abbreviations:
SOP : Standard Operating Procedure
OOS : Out of Specification
A.R. : Analytical Reference
No. : Number